When might an organization prefer a physical trunk over a virtual trunk?

When might an organization prefer a physical trunk over a virtual trunk?

• A. When flexibility and speed are essential
• B. When using a highly virtualized network
• C. When certain legacy systems cannot integrate
• D. When aiming for lower initial costs

Answer: (C)

A physical trunk may be preferred over a virtual trunk in situations where certain legacy systems cannot integrate effectively with modern virtual technologies. Legacy systems often rely on specific hardware connections and protocols that may not be compatible with virtualized networking architectures. By utilizing a physical trunk, organizations can ensure reliable communication, compatibility, and adherence to the required data transmission standards of these older systems. This choice helps maintain operational continuity without the risk of integration issues that might arise from compliance with newer networking paradigms. In addition to the primary context of legacy system integration, it is notable that physical trunks can provide stability and reliability in scenarios where network performance is critical, as they can often offer lower latency and higher bandwidth compared to virtual alternatives that may introduce additional overhead or complexity.

A physical trunk may be preferred over a virtual trunk in situations where certain legacy systems cannot integrate effectively with modern virtual technologies. Legacy systems often rely on specific hardware connections and protocols that may not be compatible with virtualized networking architectures. By utilizing a physical trunk, organizations can ensure reliable communication, compatibility, and adherence to the required data transmission standards of these older systems. This choice helps maintain operational continuity without the risk of integration issues that might arise from compliance with newer networking paradigms.

In addition to the primary context of legacy system integration, it is notable that physical trunks can provide stability and reliability in scenarios where network performance is critical, as they can often offer lower latency and higher bandwidth compared to virtual alternatives that may introduce additional overhead or complexity.